
Last night I co-hosted a, “members only” training call for people in my primary business and the #1 income earner in the company, mr. Ray Higdon. I got such an amazing response from the training that I decided to break the rules and give you guys exclusive access to the content. Now I do mention my primary network marketing business in the video so if you are offended by that by all means don’t watch!
A while back I was listening to an audio training by Jeffrey Combs. I think it was the psychology of prospecting but I can’t remember for sure. Jeffrey talked about how in his hay-day of network marketing when he was pulling in over a million a year he was averaging about 150 voicemail leads a week. He discussed how a voicemail lead is a high quality lead because its a lead that calls you and requests information rather than you calling them. Makes sense right?
So watch the following video and I’ll teach you the unique strategies I use to generate local voicemail leads to build my local team.
Ray sounds like a pretty cool guy, huh? Visit this site to learn how to work with us in the Numis Network..The ONLY network marketing company where the product is MONEY!
Visit this post for more training in network marketing
If you enjoyed this training video and took something of value away from it please feel free to share it with your social media audience and leave me a comment below.
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Please Leave An Irreverent Comment Below & Thanks A Million For Visiting!








27. April 2011 at 2:31 am
Awesome Adam I am excited about it.It’s 4 :28 Am I am watching your content.
29. April 2011 at 7:03 pm
Thanks Adam for the tips. I wish I had read this when I started. I was that guy with the loaded gun shooting my mouth off where ever i went!
12. May 2011 at 2:28 pm
This is KILLER!!! i’m buying those signs asap. great post!
25. September 2011 at 4:43 pm
This is awesome, Adam. Great value, once again. Thanks for sharing.
13. April 2012 at 6:31 pm
In the awesome pattern of things you get an A with regard to effort. Where exactly you actually misplaced everybody was on all the specifics. You know, it is said, the devil is in the details… And it couldn’t be more accurate at this point. Having said that, allow me inform you what did give good results. The article (parts of it) is definitely really powerful and that is probably the reason why I am taking an effort to opine. I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that. Second, while I can easily notice the leaps in logic you make, I am definitely not convinced of exactly how you seem to connect the ideas that help to make the actual final result. For the moment I will subscribe to your point but hope in the near future you connect your facts much better.